1993 Mazda 626 vs. 2005 MCC Smart
To start off, 2005 MCC Smart is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mazda 626 (110 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2005 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mazda 626 weights approximately 400 kg more than 2005 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mazda 626 (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Smart. (112 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1993 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda 626 | 2005 MCC Smart | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | 626 | Smart |
Year Released | 1993 | 2005 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2370 mm |