1993 Mazda 626 vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (110 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mazda 626 weights approximately 2 kg more than 2009 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mazda 626 (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1993 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mazda 626 | 2009 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 626 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1218 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2580 mm |
