1993 Mazda 626 vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Ram (390 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (110 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1198 kg more than 1993 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Ram (551 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 626. (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda 626 | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Mazda | Dodge |
Model | 626 | Ram |
Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 551 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 2418 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5817 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3569 mm |