1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 1971 Rover 2000
To start off, 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Rover 2000 weights approximately 461 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Rover 2000 (172 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 1971 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 1971 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | AZ-1 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1993 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2640 mm |