1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 1979 Subaru 1400
To start off, 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Subaru 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Subaru 1400 would be higher. At 1,361 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Subaru 1400 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mazda AZ-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Subaru 1400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 1979 Subaru 1400 | |
| Make | Mazda | Subaru |
| Model | AZ-1 | 1400 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 1361 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
