1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 46 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Because 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mazda AZ-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Seat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Seat Ritmo (92 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 1980 Seat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 1980 Seat Ritmo | |
| Make | Mazda | Seat |
| Model | AZ-1 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1993 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 1197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2460 mm |
