1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 196 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma (117 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | AZ-1 | Sigma |
Year Released | 1993 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2520 mm |