1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 1982 Volvo 260
To start off, 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 260 weights approximately 536 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Volvo 260 (230 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 1982 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 1982 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | AZ-1 | 260 |
Year Released | 1993 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2849 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 73 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2660 mm |