1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 486 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Because 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mazda AZ-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | AZ-1 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1993 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2680 mm |