1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 366 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Because 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mazda AZ-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass (237 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | AZ-1 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1993 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2640 mm |