1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 1996 Rover 400 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda AZ-1 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mazda AZ-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 400 (145 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 1996 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | AZ-1 | 400 |
Year Released | 1993 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2560 mm |