1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 1997 Renault Clio
To start off, 1997 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda AZ-1 would be higher. At 1,170 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Clio weights approximately 21 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Because 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mazda AZ-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 85 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 1997 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | AZ-1 | Clio |
Year Released | 1993 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 75.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 64.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2550 mm |