1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda AZ-1 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 285 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Because 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mazda AZ-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (180 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | AZ-1 | Celica |
Year Released | 1993 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 189 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2610 mm |