1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 2002 Rover 75
To start off, 2002 Rover 75 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda AZ-1 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Rover 75 weights approximately 558 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Because 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mazda AZ-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Rover 75 (160 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 2002 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 2002 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | AZ-1 | 75 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 160 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1392 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2750 mm |