1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 2011 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2011 Kia Cee'd is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda AZ-1 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 565 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Because 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mazda AZ-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Kia Cee'd (137 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 2011 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 2011 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Mazda | Kia |
Model | AZ-1 | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1993 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 77.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 74.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2660 mm |