1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda AZ-1 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1087 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Because 2011 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1993 Mazda AZ-1 has manual transmission. 1993 Mazda AZ-1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | AZ-1 | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1921 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2748 mm |
