1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 2012 Ford E-150
To start off, 2012 Ford E-150 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda AZ-1 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1777 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford E-150 (387 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 2012 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. 2012 Ford E-150 has automatic transmission and 1993 Mazda AZ-1 has manual transmission. 1993 Mazda AZ-1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford E-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 2012 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | AZ-1 | E-150 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 387 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 2611 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 2085 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 3505 mm |