1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 2012 Kia Optima
To start off, 2012 Kia Optima is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda AZ-1 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Optima weights approximately 620 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Because 1993 Mazda AZ-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mazda AZ-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Kia Optima (252 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 2012 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 2012 Kia Optima | |
Make | Mazda | Kia |
Model | AZ-1 | Optima |
Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 252 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1454 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4844 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1831 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2797 mm |