1993 Mazda AZ-1 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda AZ-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda AZ-1 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1046 kg more than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (625 Nm) has 540 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda AZ-1. (85 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda AZ-1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mazda AZ-1 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
| Model | AZ-1 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 625 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 93 mm |
| Top Speed | 152 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 834 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 5252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 2105 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 3157 mm |
