1993 Mazda MX-3 vs. 1956 Rover P4
To start off, 1993 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1956 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda MX-3 | 1956 Rover P4 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | MX-3 | P4 |
Year Released | 1993 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2830 mm |