1993 Mazda MX-3 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1993 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda MX-3 | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | MX-3 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1993 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2480 mm |