1993 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Mazda MX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda MX-3 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | MX-3 | Clio |
Year Released | 1993 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2690 mm |