1993 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1993 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1993 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP) has 198 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mazda RX-7 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | RX-7 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1993 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |
