1993 Mazda RX-7 vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1993 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP) has 139 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 100 kg more than 1993 Mazda RX-7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda RX-7 | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | RX-7 | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1993 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3030 mm |