1993 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1993 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1993 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mazda RX-7 (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mazda RX-7 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | RX-7 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |