1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 weights approximately 555 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mercedes-Benz 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mercedes-Benz 320 | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
Model | 320 | Clio |
Year Released | 1993 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |