1993 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 3,606 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E (268 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 735 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1993 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mercedes-Benz E | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Saab |
Model | E | 92 |
Year Released | 1993 | 1952 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3606 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2480 mm |