1993 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1972 TVR M
To start off, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 TVR M would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 TVR M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1972 TVR M. (105 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1972 TVR M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 451 kg more than 1972 TVR M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E (190 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 TVR M. (180 Nm). This means 1993 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 TVR M.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mercedes-Benz E | 1972 TVR M | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | TVR |
Model | E | M |
Year Released | 1993 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1200 mm |