1993 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2003 Isuzu D-MAX
To start off, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 2,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E (134 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2003 Isuzu D-MAX. (129 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2003 Isuzu D-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Isuzu D-MAX weights approximately 372 kg more than 1993 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX (300 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mercedes-Benz E. (190 Nm). This means 2003 Isuzu D-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mercedes-Benz E.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mercedes-Benz E | 2003 Isuzu D-MAX | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Isuzu |
Model | E | D-MAX |
Year Released | 1993 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 300 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1740 mm |