1993 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2010 Mazda 5
To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 5,956 cc (8 cylinders), 1993 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 5. (153 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 5.
Because 1993 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E (470 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 5. (200 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1993 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mercedes-Benz E | 2010 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
| Model | E | 5 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5956 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 375 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 470 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1753 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1631 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2751 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 60 L |
