1993 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1993 Mercedes-Benz E. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1993 Mercedes-Benz E.
Because 1993 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mercedes-Benz E. (190 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mercedes-Benz E.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mercedes-Benz E | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
Model | E | Epica |
Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1450 mm |