1993 Mini MK VI vs. 2011 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-V is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 107 more horse power than 1993 Mini MK VI. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1993 Mini MK VI.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mini MK VI. (68 Nm). This means 2011 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mini MK VI. 2011 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1993 Mini MK VI has manual transmission. 1993 Mini MK VI will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mini MK VI | 2011 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Mini | Honda |
| Model | MK VI | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4554 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1819 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2619 mm |
