1993 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mitsubishi Magna (115 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Clio weights approximately 475 kg more than 1993 Mitsubishi Magna.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mitsubishi Magna (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (152 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1993 Mitsubishi Magna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mitsubishi Magna | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Magna | Clio |
Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2580 mm |