1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Toyota Mark II is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Toyota Mark II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Toyota Mark II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Mark II (200 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. (95 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Mum 500 | Mark II |
Year Released | 1993 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 500 cc | 1988 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Torque | 95 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |