1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (370 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. (95 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 has automatic transmission and 2010 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
Model | Mum 500 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 500 cc | 3600 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 304 HP |
Torque | 95 Nm | 370 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |