1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 vs. 2010 Volvo S40
To start off, 2010 Volvo S40 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo S40 (320 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. (95 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 | 2010 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Mum 500 | S40 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 500 cc | 2500 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
