1993 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma (168 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (88 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar.
Because 1986 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Sigma | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1993 | 1986 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 88 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |