1993 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2000 Kia Sephia II
To start off, 2000 Kia Sephia II is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma (168 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2000 Kia Sephia II. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Sephia II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Kia Sephia II has automatic transmission and 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma has manual transmission. 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Kia Sephia II will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2000 Kia Sephia II | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Kia |
Model | Sigma | Sephia II |
Year Released | 1993 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 79 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |