1993 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2000 Volvo S60. (136 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S60 weights approximately 33 kg more than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (270 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Sigma | S60 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1509 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2800 mm |
