1993 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2002 Ford F-150
To start off, 2002 Ford F-150 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford F-150 (202 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 2002 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Ford F-150 has automatic transmission and 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma has manual transmission. 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford F-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2002 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Sigma | F-150 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2002 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |