1993 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2010 SsangYong Stavic

To start off, 2010 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma (168 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2010 SsangYong Stavic. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2010 SsangYong Stavic.

Because 2010 SsangYong Stavic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 SsangYong Stavic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma has manual transmission. 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: