1993 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2011 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2011 Fiat Bravo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2011 Fiat Bravo. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2011 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 41 kg more than 2011 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Fiat Bravo (361 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2011 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Fiat |
Model | Sigma | Bravo |
Year Released | 1993 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |