1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
To start off, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward should accelerate faster than 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 1235 kg more than 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (490 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner. 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward has automatic transmission and 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner has manual transmission. 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Space Runner | Park Ward |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1834 cc | 5379 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 322 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 490 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 2450 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3370 mm |
