1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Space Runner | E-350 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2619 mm |