1993 Opel Omega vs. 2004 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,931 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1993 Opel Omega. (148 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1993 Opel Omega.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Opel Omega. (220 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Opel Omega.

Compare all specifications:

1993 Opel Omega 2004 Ford Mustang
Make Opel Ford
Model Omega Mustang
Year Released 1993 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2590 cc 3931 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 310 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 88 mm 100.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 69 mm 84.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 7 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 61 L