1993 Plymouth Colt vs. 1998 Acura EL
To start off, 1998 Acura EL is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,833 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1993 Plymouth Colt. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1993 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 146 kg more than 1998 Acura EL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Plymouth Colt (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura EL. (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1993 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Plymouth Colt | 1998 Acura EL | |
| Make | Plymouth | Acura |
| Model | Colt | EL |
| Year Released | 1993 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1833 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1079 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4478 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1704 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2619 mm |
