1993 Plymouth Prowler vs. 2012 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2012 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Plymouth Prowler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Plymouth Prowler would be higher.
Because 1993 Plymouth Prowler is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Plymouth Prowler. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota RAV4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Plymouth Prowler | 2012 Toyota RAV4 | |
| Make | Plymouth | Toyota |
| Model | Prowler | RAV4 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
