1993 Renault Clio vs. 1960 Seat 600

To start off, 1993 Renault Clio is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Renault Clio (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1960 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1960 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Renault Clio weights approximately 325 kg more than 1960 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Renault Clio (107 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1993 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: