1993 Renault Clio vs. 2002 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2002 Lancia Zeta is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Renault Clio (138 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2002 Lancia Zeta. (134 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2002 Lancia Zeta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 625 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Renault Clio (187 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lancia Zeta. (181 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1993 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lancia Zeta.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Renault Clio | 2002 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Renault | Lancia |
Model | Clio | Zeta |
Year Released | 1993 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Size | 1764 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1720 mm |