1993 Renault Clio vs. 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara
To start off, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara (165 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara weights approximately 490 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara (220 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (187 Nm). This means 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Renault Clio | 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara | |
| Make | Renault | Suzuki |
| Model | Clio | Grand Vitara |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Size | 1764 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 75 mm |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1465 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1730 mm |
